"Fully Managed" vs. Self-Hosted: What "No IT Team Required" Actually Means
"Self-hosted" has a certain appeal — you own the server, you control the data, nothing depends on a vendor staying in business. For a team with dedicated infrastructure staff, that tradeoff can make sense. For most small and mid-sized organizations, it doesn't. Here's the part that doesn't make it into the pitch.What self-hosting actually requires, ongoing
Standing up a server is the easy part. Keeping it running is the job:- Security patching. Every dependency, every library, every OS-level package needs updates applied before it becomes the entry point for a breach — on a schedule, indefinitely.
- Backups that actually restore. Not just backups that run — backups that have been tested to restore cleanly, on a schedule someone remembers to check.
- Uptime. When the server goes down at 11pm, someone has to notice, diagnose, and fix it, or your team can't work until they do.
- Capacity planning. As your team and your data grow, someone has to notice before the server runs out of room or falls over under load.
What "fully managed" means in practice
Fully managed means Dexal carries that operational weight, not you. Concretely:- You don't provision a server. There's no infrastructure to stand up before your team can start working.
- You don't patch anything. Security updates and dependency upgrades happen on our schedule, not whenever someone remembers.
- You don't own the backup problem. Backup and restore posture is part of what you're paying for, not a project you have to plan yourself.
- You don't get paged at 11pm. Uptime is our responsibility, not a rotation your team has to staff.